I find the website faults that get people sued.

Accessibility audits and performance repair for websites, with the evidence handed to you in writing. Measured, dated and specific — not a score out of a hundred.

For web agencies with accessibility in their client contracts, and for businesses whose site takes card payments or bookings.

The first measurement is free and yours to keep, whether or not you hire me.

The problem, and what closes it

Your scanner says the site is fine. It is checking about a third of the rules.

Automated tools detect roughly 35% of WCAG success criteria. The rest needs a person operating the page by hand — which is where the barriers that actually block people live.

If you leave it

$5k – $25k

The typical opening demand in a US web accessibility claim. Defending a filed suit runs $50,000 to $200,000.

Plaintiffs' firms scan sites in bulk and pick the easy ones. 3,117 federal web accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2025, up 27% on the year before, and about 70% of them hit ecommerce and retail.

What closes it

$1,500

One audit. Every barrier found, ranked by severity, with what it takes to fix each one — and a dated record of the whole thing.

That record is the first item your attorney asks for if a letter ever arrives. It is also the thing a plaintiff's firm cannot easily argue you ignored.

The arithmetic

Same scale on every bar.

Nothing here is a projection. These are the reported ranges for US web accessibility claims, drawn to one scale so the proportion does the talking.

This auditwhat you pay me$1,500
Typical demand letter settlement$5,000 – $25,000
Defending a filed lawsuit$50,000 – $200,000+

If your customers include Californians, add the Unruh Act: any ADA violation is automatically an Unruh violation, carrying a $4,000 statutory minimum per violation with no requirement to prove harm.

Exactly what you get

Four things land in your inbox.

Not a dashboard login, not a PDF of coloured gauges. Documents a developer can act on and a lawyer can read.

01

A findings report

Every barrier found, ranked critical through minor, each with the WCAG criterion it fails and the page it is on.

02

A remediation list

What to change, in plain terms your developers can work from. No jargon wall, no "consult a specialist".

03

The keyboard walk

What I found operating the site by hand, which is the part no tool produces. Usually the most serious thing in the report.

04

A dated record

Testing date, method, browsers, standard applied. The evidence your attorney wants if a demand letter ever turns up.

Read a real report — client details removed

What that actually looks like

A real finding, from a real site.

This page was reported clean by an automated scan. Then I went through it with a keyboard.

client site · contact page · tested 24 Sep 2026 · WCAG 2.1.2 Level A 11. <a> GET FREE QUOTE 12. <a> Phones 13. <a> Email 14. <iframe> [map embed] ← focus enters the map 15. <iframe> [map embed] ← still the map 16. <iframe> [map embed] ← still the map focus stops advancing. the contact form is unreachable.
Working pages
59 tab stops
Contact page
dies at 16
What it means
No keyboard user can send an enquiry

What happens next

Nothing happens that you have not agreed to.

Straight answers

I cannot promise you will never get a demand letter. Nobody honest can.

  • An audit reports conformance against WCAG 2.2 AA on a date. It is not a certification, and I am not a lawyer.
  • Automated tools detect roughly a third of the criteria. A human pass extends that without closing it. Anyone telling you otherwise is selling you something — the FTC fined one such vendor $1M in 2025.
  • PDFs, video captions, mobile apps and anything behind a login are not included unless we agree them separately. I will not let you assume they are.
  • Fixed price agreed before I start. Every change documented with a rollback step. On performance work, if the numbers do not move you do not pay for the fix.

Send me a URL.

I will measure it and send you what I find, usually within two working days. No charge, and no follow-up unless you ask for one.